View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007, 06:12 AM
mblumenthal mblumenthal is offline
Registered member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 41
mblumenthal Overly Aggrandized
mblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandizedmblumenthal Overly Aggrandized
Quote:
Originally Posted by earlpearl View Post
Pittbug:

My phrases come from a combination of keyword tools like overture, wordtracker, google adword tools, etc. Customer suggestions and tests came up a w/ a lot of them. I reviewed competitor sites for some of them, experimentation, and understanding the key motivation for buying the service all contributed to the variety of terms.

My experience has shown to use as many keyword tools as possible and look for the phrases that show on all of them. It doesn't necessarily matter whether overture says term A is second best and wordtracker says term A is 7th best. Duplication of the phrase in multiple keyword tools suggests its used across the board.
My question here revolves around the idea of creating SEO operatioal efficiencies. Knowing can be more or less complete. The idea would be to develop a quick technique that is mostly accurate enough so that the service can be delivered cost effectively and still be highly successful.

Kinda of like the 5 question physch survey that determines whether a teen is likely to do themselves harm...it isn't the complete answer but it gives some powerful clues...

So I was asking if you could model the research along those lines successfully.

Mike
Reply With Quote