Search Engine Optimization Forum - SEO Refugee  

Go Back   Search Engine Optimization Forum - SEO Refugee > SEO and Online Marketing > Google

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2007, 02:02 PM
skitzzo's Avatar
working on my empire...
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: online
Posts: 5,608
skitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guru
skitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guruskitzzo SEOR Guru
Send a message via AIM to skitzzo
Should Google Include Social Bookmarking Sites?

Search Engine Journal recently wrote an article quoting pieces of a debate that's sprung up about digg (and more generically, the social bookmarking sites) being included in google's index.

Here are the arguments:

Allen Stern:
Quote:
My belief is that this is not enough to warrant a listing in Google. Since at its most basic sense Digg only offers a link to the actual story, then that story should occupy that position within Google, not the Digg link. I believe content publishers actually lose the chance to see that visitor because the person has to click twice and even understand that they must do that. And I am talking about mainstream non-diggers now, not the group who already understands what Digg is for.
William Burn:
Quote:
Digg.com is acting as a gateway to the great content which would (usually) have been lost in Google’s monolithic index, never to be found or stumbled upon by searchers. Additionally, as a counter to his “the person has to click twice and even understand that they must do that” statement, the Digg.com interface is very easy to use, it’s almost an exact clone of a Google result (a big blue link/title with description underneath) so the user will already be familiar with it, as a result the user would not be confused by it and will find their way to the content they were looking for; that’s if the content still appeals to them after reading the accompanying description.
Personally, I am a bit conflicted on this issue. Digg obviously has the ability to provide extra search engine exposure for content. If said content is on a site that doesn't rank well in the SE's then the Digg listing can help guide traffic to the content.

However, as Allen said, Digg is just listing a sentence or two of the content. That's not nearly enough and really that listing shouldn't come before the actual content that Digg is pointing to. So, IMO google and the other SE's should figure out a way to rank the original content before Digg's listing, perhaps with the Digg listing (and the subsequent discussion on the topic) as a sub-listing. This could be done for any and all of the major social bookmarking sites that link to that specific story.

What do you think?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
 

  Search Engine Optimization Forum - SEO Refugee > SEO and Online Marketing > Google

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:23 AM. - Contact Us - SEOrefugee.com - a Search Engine Optimization Forum - Top

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO Refugee