21
Dec
2005
Posted by Skitzzo as Google
You may even hear people say that itâs good to keep fresh content on your site. But, how much of a difference does fresh content actually make?
Iâd argue, bigger than you might think. But more importantly, posting fresh content on an irregular basis can damage your rankings more than if you published a site andâ¦never touched it again. Let me explain.
From the Google Patent Application
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more types of history data includes information relating to a manner in which a content of the document changes over time; and wherein the generating a score includes: determining a frequency at which the content of the document changes over time, and scoring the document based, at least in part, on the frequency at which the content of the document changes over time.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the frequency at which the content of the document changes is based on at least one of an average time between the changes, a number of changes in a time period, and a comparison of a rate of change in a current time period with a rate of change in a previous time period.
8. The method of claim 6, wherein the generating a score further includes: determining an amount by which the content of the document changes over time, and scoring the document based, at least in part, on the frequency at which and the amount by which the content of the document changes over time.
Now, obviously I highlighted the parts pertinent to this discussion. As you can see in item 6, the frequency of change has at least some affect on the rankings. Item 7 shows us that the average time between changes is then compared to the sites history and how often it has been updated in the past. Item 8 not only mentions frequency again, but brings the amount a site was changed into the picture. Hereâs why this is criticalâ¦
A professor once told me âIf I mention something more than once, its probably important.â Well just in those few sections, G mentions frequency of change a couple of times.
Now with the advent of the blog, many sites have begun to get fresh content on their site daily if not even more frequently. But what if your site doesnât have a blog? What if you only occasionally add new content or never add to your site? How does all this affect you? Let me address those two issues separately.
First, I will deal with those who put their site up, and leave it. You donât add new content, you donât blog, you donât even think about your site unless something goes wrong. But, you also have decent rankings. If fresh content is so important why is this possible?
I would say that looking specifically at the phrase âa comparison of a rate of change⦠with a rate of change in a previous time periodâ suggests Google simply doesnât expect fresh content from your site. If you havenât ever added to your site or changed the content, then G has no reason to expect you will in the future. Your site will rank purely on the merit of the content that is on your site and not suffer at all because you havenât let G down. They never once came to your site looking for new content only to be disappointed. Now, small changes such as grammar or punctuation probably donât register as a large enough âamountâ of change to count as fresh content in Gâs eyes.
This brings us to the infrequent content changes. You might write an article whenever the mood strikes you or even crank out a couple of pages of new content in one day. Then again, you might 2 months without touching your site at all. In my mind, this is where you enter dangerous territory in terms of your rankings. Hereâs why.
Google spiders your site and sees a significant amount of fresh content or changed content. This moves you out of the âno expectationsâ category. Google now expects to see fresh content on some sort of regular basis. Whether itâs every day or every week, Google expects to see some change. A week or two goes by and you add another article which Google gobbles up. This only serves to confirm Googleâs expectations for your site. When you get lazy, go on vacation, or simply hit writers block, Google spiders your site, sees no changes, and compares that to your site history.
Bottom line, if you let the big G down, you are in store for a big letdown in G.
Now, now, now⦠I can hear you all already. âProofâ you are screaming, âWe want proof!â Well, Iâm working on it.
For the past two and a half months we have made no changes at all to our site other than add two new articles. Originally, the plan was for these articles to be released on a regular monthly basis. But so far, that hasnât happened. While watching our sites SERP rankings lately, I began to notice a trend. The week after we post a new article, our SERPs jump up about 20 spots. The week after that we fall about 10 spots and two weeks after we posted our article we were back where we started.
Well, about two more weeks after that, we posted another new article. About 4 or 5 days later we saw another jump in the SERPs of about 20 spots (give or take). A week after, the previous falling pattern repeated itself.
Next week we will be publishing a third article on our site and if we see the same pattern in our SERPs that will be enough to convince me. Either way I will post the URL of the site (donât want to influence the data) and a graph of our SERP ranks for all to see and decide for yourself what you think.
In the mean time, whatever you do, donât let the big G down.
Popularity: 7% [?]

© 2007 SEO Refugee - Search Engine Optimization Blog and Forums web design by studioJMC powered by WordPress

4 Responses
SEOrefugee Blog » Blog Archive » Reworked…
December 22nd, 2005 at 3:24 pm
1[…] Well, due to time constraints placed on me by my “real” job, I didn’t have time to write up a new article today. I did however get some time to rework my Irregular Content article. I think I focused it a bit more and (hopefully) made it an easier read. I think that I was a bit unclear with what I was trying to discuss. Anyway, if you haven’t already checked it out be sure to do so and let me know what you think of it. If you’ve already read it, maybe give it a second look and let me know what you think of the changes I made. I’ll do my best to have a fresh article for you guys to read sometime tomorrow. Thanks! You can leave a response in the forum. « Technorati… […]
Steve
March 14th, 2007 at 8:05 am
2We do have some evidence to back up what you’re saying:
http://www.alledia.com/blog/seo-competition/march-update-to-search-engine-optimization-test/
I was trying hard to work out what the results meant until I came across your post here.
blamcast
April 2nd, 2007 at 7:32 pm
3I wonder if it’s more to do with getting a bunch of external links from people linking to your post, aggregating your RSS, etc. As those fresh links fall off the front page of other sites, your ranking goes back down.
Does Google look at your Website Generator to rank your Pages
May 13th, 2007 at 3:08 pm
4[…] Now Steve of Alledia does a test with WordPress, Joomla and Drupal and he was trying to figure out what was causing WordPress to start so well, but runs into trouble later on. It could of course be due to the explanation of SeoRefugee in his Post Google Irregular Content Upgrade […]
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: GATESY AT THE BAT
next post: Technorati…
to top of page...