<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Response to Digg Listings in Google Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/</link>
	<description>search engine optimization information from our seo blog and seo forum</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Roundtable</title>
		<link>http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Roundtable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 12:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Should Digg Pages Be Listed on Google.com?&lt;/strong&gt;

Two days ago Loren Baker wrote Does Digg.com Belong in Google Results? He basically summarized two points of view, the first by Allen Stern who says that Digg adds no value to the story and should not be indexed (hence...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Should Digg Pages Be Listed on Google.com?</strong></p>
<p>Two days ago Loren Baker wrote Does Digg.com Belong in Google Results? He basically summarized two points of view, the first by Allen Stern who says that Digg adds no value to the story and should not be indexed (hence&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovekills_s</title>
		<link>http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>lovekills_s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 06:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm... Quite Interesting article man.. Point is (just a comparison) like wiki made its space in SERPS, digg and other socila bookmark servcies are tryin to pour in themselves..they are feeling superior.. another add to our competition ruining the organic searches..

The idea is good, but more or less digg should be treated as an enhanced version of blogs software with nofollow ..

The real problem could be people stealing content from other sites, and posting them as there own in there coloums, henceforth digg comes up in SERPS.. nofollow cud be just helpful.. they should be thinking on this..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230; Quite Interesting article man.. Point is (just a comparison) like wiki made its space in SERPS, digg and other socila bookmark servcies are tryin to pour in themselves..they are feeling superior.. another add to our competition ruining the organic searches..</p>
<p>The idea is good, but more or less digg should be treated as an enhanced version of blogs software with nofollow ..</p>
<p>The real problem could be people stealing content from other sites, and posting them as there own in there coloums, henceforth digg comes up in SERPS.. nofollow cud be just helpful.. they should be thinking on this..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skitzzo</title>
		<link>http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Skitzzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 04:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Um, not quite a nofollow... more like give Digg and Reddit etc  a penalty but only when compared to the original content and visa versa. The important thing is to make it ONLY in regards to original content or the SB site. It shouldn't be boosted up above other sites in the SERPs. At least IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, not quite a nofollow&#8230; more like give Digg and Reddit etc  a penalty but only when compared to the original content and visa versa. The important thing is to make it ONLY in regards to original content or the SB site. It shouldn&#8217;t be boosted up above other sites in the SERPs. At least IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lea</title>
		<link>http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Lea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>So... you are suggesting that the engines should apply the equivalent of a meta noindex,follow to websites like Digg ?
Interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; you are suggesting that the engines should apply the equivalent of a meta noindex,follow to websites like Digg ?<br />
Interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kav</title>
		<link>http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>kav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 03:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/01/03/a-response-to-digg-listings-in-google-results/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>See digg for my comments on your article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See digg for my comments on your article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.166 seconds -->
