Comments on: Pictorial Proof of Digg Censorship http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/proof-of-digg-censorship/ search engine optimization information from our seo blog and seo forum Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:47:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: digitalnomad http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-8244 digitalnomad Thu, 03 May 2007 18:18:06 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/pictoral-proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-8244 Digg is a monumental waste of time (IMO). Digg is a monumental waste of time (IMO).

]]> By: allsux http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5926 allsux Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:53:04 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/pictoral-proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5926 update: my website (allsux.com) now has a way to get around url bans and to post duplicate stories - in short, an easy and amazingly obvious way to undermine their systems update: my website (allsux.com) now has a way to get around url bans and to post duplicate stories - in short, an easy and amazingly obvious way to undermine their systems

]]> By: Does Digg play fair? | ChillyCool Web Digger http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5907 Does Digg play fair? | ChillyCool Web Digger Wed, 04 Apr 2007 22:11:13 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/pictoral-proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5907 [...] has always claimed they don’t censor stories. Now SEORefugee offers some compelling evidence that maybe indeed they [...] [...] has always claimed they don’t censor stories. Now SEORefugee offers some compelling evidence that maybe indeed they [...]

]]> By: Doug http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5852 Doug Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:37:59 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/pictoral-proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5852 Not all Digg votes are weighted equally. It varies by user. It could be that the moderator's voting power (according to the pre-existing algorithms they have set up) was enough to place your post in purgatory. I don't think that its moderator status per se - rather just the overall rating of this user. Not all Digg votes are weighted equally. It varies by user.

It could be that the moderator’s voting power (according to the pre-existing algorithms they have set up) was enough to place your post in purgatory.

I don’t think that its moderator status per se - rather just the overall rating of this user.

]]> By: allsux http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5801 allsux Wed, 04 Apr 2007 07:25:42 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/04/03/pictoral-proof-of-digg-censorship/#comment-5801 For MORE pictoral prove of how Digg is completely corrupt, as well as links to other stories (both humorous and horrifying) relating to Digg scandals check out and/or link to http://allsux.com :P For MORE pictoral prove of how Digg is completely corrupt, as well as links to other stories (both humorous and horrifying) relating to Digg scandals check out and/or link to http://allsux.com :P

]]>