11
Jun
2007
Posted by Skitzzo as Google
Google, Google, Google… what am I going to do with you? As most of you know, Google recently updated their Webmaster Guidelines, including a new page on why one should report paid links to Google. The new page included this snippet :
However, some SEOs and webmasters engage in the practice of buying and selling links, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites. Buying links in order to improve a site’s ranking is in violation of Google’s webmaster guidelines and can negatively impact a site’s ranking in search results.
So, one would expect Google to abide by their own rules and guidelines right? Well, as Scott from MarketingPilgrim points out, that’s not exactly the case. Apparently if you’d like a PR7 link from Google, it will cost you a mere $1,995. To make the offer even more appealing, they’ll throw in a Google Mini as well! Now that’s what I call a bargain.
Want to see a list of all the websites that are, along with Google of course, currently in violation of Google’s newly updated Webmaster Guidelines? No problem, Google’s provided it for you.
As if that weren’t enough, Google’s also breaking their own Design and Quality Guidelines. Hey, I mean if you’re gonna go, go all out right? As you can see, Google clearly states that “If the site map is larger than 100 or so links, you may want to break the site map into separate pages.” Now, I’m no mathematician, but even I know that page has more than 100 or so links.
So, will Google deindex themsevles? Will they remove all the offending sites that have been caught red handed? I wouldn’t hold my breath.
© 2008 SEO Refugee - Search Engine Optimization Blog and Forums Custom Website Design powered by WordPress

14 Responses
nerd
June 11th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
1What’s the difference between people who buy links to improve their SERPs and people who buy links directly for the traffic those links provide. Paid links is the least of google’s problems, they should focus on something more productive.
Skitzzo
June 11th, 2007 at 3:14 pm
2You know, that’s a very good point. If you buy a link for the traffic it sends directly to your site, why is that any different than buying the link to increase your search engine rankings and therefore bring you more traffic? Seems to be a VERY fair question.
Michael VanDeMar
June 12th, 2007 at 12:57 am
3Well, no, there is a huge difference between the two. However, nerd nailed it dead on… Google has much bigger things to worry about. The number of people who are buying links is minuscule compared to the number of people successfully spamming the index in other ways, and lately the relevancy leaves quite a bit to be desired. They have no business letting themselves get distracted at this point.
Cornwall SEO
June 12th, 2007 at 9:26 am
4Maybe that’s why they bought as SEO firm, to get some seo advice for free. Although they get enough free advice from us SEO bloggers, ha!
Marc
June 13th, 2007 at 7:58 am
5I agree fully with Nerd and Michael VanDeMar, I have been crying for years about google’s inability to stay focused.
I think they have gotten to big for their britches like Microsoft and forgot what got them there, and are soon to be overthrown.
I call adsense an “out of control Golem,” cause of all the spam powered by it in their damn index.
Buying text-links is just like buying banner ads and such, penalizing for it is crazy. they are just mad people found a massive loophole in their algorithm.
let me stop ranting before i get too worked up early in the morning… …humbug
Blogging with Desi Baba
June 13th, 2007 at 10:18 am
6I think Google is just trying their best to be a monopoly, but they can’t really do much for small time bloggers who earn nothing with AdSense.
Matt Keegan
June 13th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
7Google is all over the place these days. They are not only buying up the web, but are trying to tell everyone how to run their own business. I still like Google, but enough is enough.
Petro
June 14th, 2007 at 6:47 am
8One thing is to buy links over links with the purpose to influence rankings, another is pay for a service or product and (eventually) having your own website listed as a case study or in a portfolio.
There’s a thin - but yet meaningful - difference between these two.
C’mon, who’s gonna pay two hundred bucks for one single link listed on a page with 500 un-themed others, even if the domain in subject benefits of an huge trust as Google.com does?
And, about the no-more-than-one-hundred-links thing, it is only an advice (”you MAY WANT to break…”), it’s not to be intended as a strict rule.
PayPerPost Secures $7 Million In Funding - The Article Writer - Press Releases | Web Content Writing | Targeted Articles | SEO Consulting
June 14th, 2007 at 7:44 am
9[...] of paid links, possibly forcing these companies to abandon their business models. Interestingly, SEO Refugee reported on Monday that “do no evil” Google sells PR7 (or is it PR8?) links on their [...]
Spaggie
June 14th, 2007 at 6:27 pm
10COUGH COUGH
http://www.seorefugee.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4694
Suchmaschinenoptimierung
June 14th, 2007 at 6:27 pm
11Can somebody tell me where i can get a „realtime“ backlink check for free for the SEO Results?
I have the problem that every backlink checker in the Search Engines gives a different result – sometimes more than 500 + or -.
Do you also know which is the best backlinck checker in web for an SEO beginner?
Thank you for your answer and greetings.
Links Roundup - June 19th 2007
June 19th, 2007 at 2:11 am
12[...] Google Breaks Own Guidelines - Sells Links for $1,995 - Skitzzo posts about Google getting caught breaking their own rules. [...]
Jason
June 19th, 2007 at 10:00 pm
13In the end everyone is in this business to make money period.
Cody Goodman
June 19th, 2007 at 10:13 pm
14lofl that is hilarious! oh man… thats something to post on matt cutts blog!
Sincerely, That cool dude
Cody Goodman
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: To Disclose or Not to Disclose - That is the Question
next post: After these Messages…. We’ll be Right Back!
to top of page...