Comments on: Rand Fishkin Interview: A Response http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/ search engine optimization information from our seo blog and seo forum Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:47:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Tom http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-39050 Tom Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:53:50 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-39050 Thanks for the interview. It`s really exciting. Thanks for the interview. It`s really exciting.

]]> By: Rand Fishkin Chooses Between Putting Up and Shutting Up - Guess Which He Chose? | Smackdown! http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-34240 Rand Fishkin Chooses Between Putting Up and Shutting Up - Guess Which He Chose? | Smackdown! Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:53:37 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-34240 [...] month there was a post on the SEO Refugee blog having to do with an interview with Rand. In the comments section that followed, Yuri Filimonov of Improve The Web actually attempted to put [...] [...] month there was a post on the SEO Refugee blog having to do with an interview with Rand. In the comments section that followed, Yuri Filimonov of Improve The Web actually attempted to put [...]

]]> By: Yuri http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-27874 Yuri Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:32:55 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-27874 Rand. I've quoted what I wanted you to answer multiple times. This is the point I want you to address: <blockquote>on the validity that Michael shows - I don’t think he shows validity. I think his arguments generally lack merit</blockquote> That's it. That's what I was asking you to address. I wanted you to back that statement up, show some sort of reason or logic behind it. If you don't want to answer, then don't. Besides, if you don't want to backup such a damaging statement with facts, I'd really appreciate, if you retract the statement and apologize before Michael. Cheers. Yuri Rand. I’ve quoted what I wanted you to answer multiple times. This is the point I want you to address:

on the validity that Michael shows - I don’t think he shows validity. I think his arguments generally lack merit

That’s it. That’s what I was asking you to address. I wanted you to back that statement up, show some sort of reason or logic behind it. If you don’t want to answer, then don’t.

Besides, if you don’t want to backup such a damaging statement with facts, I’d really appreciate, if you retract the statement and apologize before Michael.

Cheers.

Yuri

]]> By: randfish http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-27748 randfish Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:23:33 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-27748 Yuri - please, if you really are interested in hearing my response to something specific, just let me know what it is. Copy some points into the thread or quote some references, even point with links and say "the paragraph that begins with X." If I just try to guess at which elements you want me to address, it will take forever. The conversation is already dragging out an immensely long time. If you don't have time, I completely understand. I'm swamped myself, which is why I can only check the thread here once or twice a day. Yuri - please, if you really are interested in hearing my response to something specific, just let me know what it is. Copy some points into the thread or quote some references, even point with links and say “the paragraph that begins with X.” If I just try to guess at which elements you want me to address, it will take forever. The conversation is already dragging out an immensely long time.

If you don’t have time, I completely understand. I’m swamped myself, which is why I can only check the thread here once or twice a day.

]]> By: Yuri http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-27706 Yuri Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:12:00 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2007/10/17/rand-fishkin-interview-a-response/#comment-27706 Rand, the example I am giving you is your own recent saying that Michael's points lack merit, but not backing them up with facts. Where are the facts, why do you think he lacks validity? Since you have insisted on specifying evidence to prove someone's fault, I think it'd be best for you to supply facts, when accusing someone. I think claiming someone as lacking merit without evidence is called slander and isn't much appreciated, right? Rand, the example I am giving you is your own recent saying that Michael’s points lack merit, but not backing them up with facts. Where are the facts, why do you think he lacks validity?

Since you have insisted on specifying evidence to prove someone’s fault, I think it’d be best for you to supply facts, when accusing someone. I think claiming someone as lacking merit without evidence is called slander and isn’t much appreciated, right?

]]>