Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-settings.php on line 468

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-settings.php on line 483

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-settings.php on line 490

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-settings.php on line 526

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-includes/cache.php on line 103

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-includes/theme.php on line 618

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-settings.php:468) in /home/d3ot56m2/public_html/seoblog/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: SearchWiki: Now or Never for SEO http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2008/12/09/searchwiki-seo-now-or-never/ search engine optimization information from our seo blog and seo forum Thu, 23 May 2013 17:14:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Nick Stamoulis http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2008/12/09/searchwiki-seo-now-or-never/#comment-145206 Nick Stamoulis Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:09:24 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/?p=277#comment-145206 I think with every advancement in technology comes some sort of abuse and with this the abuse will happen. I think with every advancement in technology comes some sort of abuse and with this the abuse will happen.

]]> By: Photo digitzing http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2008/12/09/searchwiki-seo-now-or-never/#comment-114420 Photo digitzing Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:08:33 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/?p=277#comment-114420 I think the the WikiSEarch is only one part of big process to increase the importance of user as ranking factor. The SEO will change, when people affect on the SERPs - that's for sure. I think the the WikiSEarch is only one part of big process to increase the importance of user as ranking factor. The SEO will change, when people affect on the SERPs - that’s for sure.

]]> By: Skitzzo http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2008/12/09/searchwiki-seo-now-or-never/#comment-112241 Skitzzo Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:58:18 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/?p=277#comment-112241 Yura, yes it's for only one person but participation will only increase, especially if Google promotes it. They've also recently said that, surprise surprise, this data might well be used in the ranking algo in the future. So, while it *currently* is on an individual basis and doesn't have quite a huge adoption rate yet, I think it's much more urgent than many people are giving it credit for. Your comment about linkbuilding is a good one and could be an interesting approach, however I think there's more of the ability to catch up to your competitors in links than there are in thumb up votes in SearchWiki. Yura, yes it’s for only one person but participation will only increase, especially if Google promotes it. They’ve also recently said that, surprise surprise, this data might well be used in the ranking algo in the future. So, while it *currently* is on an individual basis and doesn’t have quite a huge adoption rate yet, I think it’s much more urgent than many people are giving it credit for.

Your comment about linkbuilding is a good one and could be an interesting approach, however I think there’s more of the ability to catch up to your competitors in links than there are in thumb up votes in SearchWiki.

]]> By: Yura http://www.seorefugee.com/seoblog/2008/12/09/searchwiki-seo-now-or-never/#comment-111973 Yura Wed, 10 Dec 2008 03:34:50 +0000 http://www.seorefugee.com/?p=277#comment-111973 While it is true, it is only true for one person. If someone thumbs up a result, it's only for him, not for others, right (at least for the time being)? Considering the participation rate on websites, I'd say that 10-30% of *logged in* use the feature, which really is a few (or several) per cent of total Google users. So it isn't that bad. For now. Of course, if you do the research to debunk/support my assumption, so much the better. You could've held the same argument with link building, too, though. The sooner the business starts building content and links for the website, the better of he'll be in the long run for the very same reasons: - not getting more loyal customers - letting competitors gain larger market share - it's getting relatively harder to outrank others While it is true, it is only true for one person. If someone thumbs up a result, it’s only for him, not for others, right (at least for the time being)? Considering the participation rate on websites, I’d say that 10-30% of *logged in* use the feature, which really is a few (or several) per cent of total Google users. So it isn’t that bad. For now.

Of course, if you do the research to debunk/support my assumption, so much the better.

You could’ve held the same argument with link building, too, though. The sooner the business starts building content and links for the website, the better of he’ll be in the long run for the very same reasons:
- not getting more loyal customers
- letting competitors gain larger market share
- it’s getting relatively harder to outrank others

]]>